首页> 外文OA文献 >Elderly Fall Risk Assessment (Elderly) Scale Using Hendrich Falls Fall And Morse Scale
【2h】

Elderly Fall Risk Assessment (Elderly) Scale Using Hendrich Falls Fall And Morse Scale

机译:使用Hendrich Falls Fall and Morse量表的老年人跌倒风险评估(老人)量表

摘要

Introduction: Incidence of falls in elderly become a serious problem for patients hospitalised with limited activity. There was now the patients instruments to measure risk of fall for elderly patients. The aimed of the study was to examine the differences of risk fall to the elderly by using instrument Hendrich Falls Scale (HFS) and Morse Falls Scale (MFS). Methods: A comparative-longitudinal design was used in this study. The population were elderly patients in the treatment room D2 and D3 Adi Husada\u27s Hospital. There were 20 elderlys as a respondents which taken by using purposive sampling technique. Dependent variable was the value of measuring the risk of falling and independent variable was the instrument of HFS and MFS. Data were analyzed by using Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test with significance level α≤0.05. Result: The results showed that HFS\u27s instrument compared with MFS in the fi rst day are equally sensitive on the presented 100%, second day: 80%, third day: 31.3%, fourth day: 20%. HFS specificity of MFS on first day compared only 64% than MFS was 100%. The statistical results tests on the both scale of assessment indicated that there were differences the value on first day p=0.180, second day p=0.58, third and fourth day p=0.001. Discussion: The use of MFS was more sensitive than HSF for detection of elderly patients with falling risk. The conclution of this results MFS\u27s instrument was more sensitive to assess elderly with risk of fall because MFS,s points more detailed assessment. It is recommended that elderly patients with falling risk need to assess by using MFS. Further research to focus on the risk of fall assessment using HFS and MFS categories.
机译:简介:对于活动受限的住院患者,老年人跌倒的发生率已成为一个严重的问题。现在有了患者仪器来测量老年患者跌倒的风险。该研究的目的是通过使用仪器Hendrich Falls Scale(HFS)和Morse Falls Scale(MFS)来检查老年人跌倒风险的差异。方法:本研究采用纵向比较设计。人群为Adi Husada医院D2和D3治疗室的老年患者。采用目的抽样技术对20名老年人进行了调查。因变量是衡量跌倒风险的价值,而自变量是HFS和MFS的工具。数据采用Wilcoxon符号秩和检验进行分析,显着性水平为α≤0.05。结果:结果表明,在提出的第一天,HFS仪器与MFS相比,在提出的100%,第二天:80%,第三天:31.3%,第四天:20%上同样敏感。与第一天相比,MFS的HFS特异性仅为100%,仅为64%。在两种评估量表上的统计结果检验表明,第一天的p = 0.180,第二天的p = 0.58,第三天和第四天的p = 0.001的值存在差异。讨论:MFS的使用比HSF更灵敏,可以检测出具有下降风险的老年患者。由于MFS指向更详细的评估,因此该结果MFS仪器的结论对于评估具有跌倒风险的老年人更为敏感。建议具有下降风险的老年患者需要使用MFS进行评估。进一步的研究集中在使用HFS和MFS类别进行跌倒评估的风险上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号